For universities & research offices
Benchmark, partner, and climb the rankings
Give your research office the evidence to raise citation impact — see exactly where you stand and what to do next.
The challenge
You can't see where you really stand
Rankings tell you the result, not the cause. Without subject-level benchmarking you can't tell which fields are lifting you and which are holding you back.
Partnerships are picked on instinct
Research collaborations are high-stakes bets, yet most are chosen without data on likely citation lift or subject fit.
What you get
Subject-level league position
Benchmark every division and subject against peer institutions to focus effort where it moves your ranking.
Evidence-led partnerships
Diagnose collaborations before you invest, and prioritise the ones most likely to raise FWCI.
Features built for this
League Tables
League Tables turn raw bibliometrics into ranked, comparable views across institutions and fields. See exactly where you lead, where you trail, and which subjects move the needle on global rankings — with transparent, reproducible methodology behind every number.
Partnership Diagnostic
The Partnership Diagnostic models co-authorship history, subject overlap, and citation lift between two institutions, so research offices can prioritise the partnerships most likely to raise output and FWCI.
Reports
Reports package the platform's analytics into shareable, citation-backed documents for vice-chancellors, funders, and policymakers — every figure traceable to its OpenAlex source.
See your institution in Connect51
Book a demo and we'll load your own data so you can see your league position live.